From Online Journal:

David Iglesias, the former U.S. attorney for New Mexico who was one of nine federal prosecutors fired two years ago for reasons that appear to be politically motivated, said a recent House vote to hold former White House counsel Harriet Miers and President Bush’s chief of staff, Josh Bolten, in contempt for refusing to testify before Congress about the matter was encouraging. But he said questions related to his dismissal remain unanswered.

In an interview following the historic vote, the first time in 25 years a full chamber of Congress voted on contempt of Congress citation, Iglesias called upon the White House to “do the right thing.”

“Congress is exercising its legitimate oversight role in this unfinished matter,” said Iglesias, who has written a book on the ordeal, “In Justice: Inside the Scandal that Rocked the Bush Administration,” that is due to be published in June. “I implore the White House to do the right thing and produce Ms. Miers and Mr. Bolten to the Congress.”

Original DVD cover.

The White House said it has no intention of producing documents to the House Judiciary Committee or allowing Bolten and Miers to testify on grounds that the information is covered by executive privilege. Attorney General Michael Mukasey testified before Congress two weeks ago that he has no plans to enforce the contempt citations.

But Congressman Maurice Hinchey (D-NY) said even if Mukasey refuses to act on the contempt citations, Congress will pursue civil litigation to enforce the subpoenas and Bolten and Miers’ testimony.

“It’s pretty clear to me that senior White House and U.S. Department of Justice officials deliberately fired U.S. attorneys who they felt were not acting in ways that were politically advantageous to the Bush administration and the Republican Party,” Hinchey said. “Those subpoenas have been ignored for far too long, which is why . . . we finally passed resolutions of contempt against them to begin the legal process of forcing them to comply or, if they continue to refuse, imposing tough consequences.”

John Conyers, the Democratic chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, agreed, and said he would vigorously pursue legal action to enforce the subpoenas to “vindicate Congress’ authority.”


Iglesias said the legal wrangling clearly indicates that the executive branch and Congress are headed for a showdown, but he added that documents in the case released thus far goes far beyond the realm of circumstantial evidence and shows culpability–and perhaps criminal behavior–on the part of several high-level former Justice Department and White House officials who were involved in his firing and sought to cover-up their involvement. Iglesias points to a transcript of an interview with career Justice Department official David Margolis conducted by congressional investigators in May 2007 in which Margolis said that he participated in a “brainstorming” session with other senior DOJ officials to come up with a reason to sell to the public and to lawmakers in the event that questions were raised about why Iglesias was ousted.

John McKay, the former US attorney for the Western District of Washington who was also fired in late 2006 for reasons that appear to have been motivated by partisan politics, wrote in a lengthy article in the January edition of the Seattle University Law Review that Iglesias’s firing stands out among the other eight federal prosecutors because it demonstrates “the very real prospect of improper interference with an ongoing criminal investigation involving public corruption and the seeking of political advantage.”

“Violations of the obstruction of justice statute may have occurred and should be investigated,” McKay wrote. “Even as the role of the White House remains shrouded in its claims of executive privilege, 23 certain White House employees appear to have been heavily involved in the dismissal of U.S. Attorney Iglesias. In several e-mails it appears that these officials were reacting directly to the complaints of Senator Pete Domenici (R-NM) and the ongoing investigation into public corruption in New Mexico. For example, Deputy White House Counsel Bill Kelley smugly e-mailed Gonzales’ Chief of Staff Kyle Sampson to report that Domenici’s office was ‘happy as a clam’ on learning of Iglesias’s ouster. Senior Counselor to the President Karl Rove bragged about Iglesias’s dismissal by proclaiming ‘he’s gone’ to the New Mexico Republican Party Chairman, who had previously complained to Rove about Iglesias.”

McKay wrote that multiple investigations at the DOJ, which are said to be in the final stages, could result in “criminal charges” against former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and other former DOJ officials involved in the dismissals “for impeding justice.”


In testimony before Congress last year, Iglesias said that a few weeks before the 2006 midterm elections he received telephone calls from Domenici, and the state’s Republican congresswoman, Heather Wilson, inquiring about the timing of an indictment against a popular Democratic official in the state who was the target of a corruption investigation. Iglesias told Domenici and Wilson he could not discuss indictments with them. Iglesias was added to a list of US attorneys to be fired on Election Day in November 2006. The official or officials responsible for drafting the list is still unknown.

Domenici is currently the subject of a Senate Ethics Committee probe for allegedly trying to pressure Iglesias into securing indictments prior to the November 2006 midterm election.

Last April, Iglesias filed a Hatch Act complaint with the White House Office of Special Counsel, alleging former White House political adviser Karl Rove and other Bush administration officials may have broken the law by orchestrating his firing.


Last May, House Democrats released a transcript of an interview congressional investigators had with one of Gonzales’s senior Justice Department staffers, Matthew Friedrich, in which Friedrich recounted that over breakfast in November 2006, Rogers and Barnett told him they were frustrated about Iglesias’s refusal to pursue cases of voter fraud and that they had spoken to Karl Rove and Domenici about having Iglesias fired.


Gonzales admitted “he took multiple phone calls from Domenici concerning [Iglesias], urging that he be replaced, and has admitted that [President Bush] spoke with him about the ‘problems’ with Iglesias,” McKay wrote.
”Gonzales has even admitted that one of the reasons that Iglesias was fired was because Senator Domenici had “lost confidence” in Iglesias.


Filed under Alberto Gonzales, Chimpy, Corruption, David Iglesias, Executive privilege, George W. Bush, Gonzogate, Harriet Miers, Hatch Act, House Judiciary Committee, humor, John Conyers, John McKay, Josh Bolten, Justice Department, Karl Rove, Kyle Sampson, Michael Mukasey, movies, parody, Pete Domenici, politics, Republicans, Scandals, Senate Ethics Committee, snark, White House scandals, Wordpress Political Blogs

9 responses to “Contemptible

  1. nightowl724

    Gonzo and Harriet! HAHAHAHA! (BTW, nice work creating the word “Gonzo.”)

    At least there’s a teeny-weenie itty-bitty dab of hope that at least one or two members of the vile and criminal Bush administration might maybe possibly see some microscopic long- overdue iota of a scintilla of justice at some distant and dim point in time.

    Now, there’s a thought worth holding onto…

  2. nonnie9999

    this is actually a poster that i did a while ago, but i had david addington and someone named bellinger (i think) behind harriet and gonzo. it was for a news story that happened when a lot of other stuff was going on, so it sat in the hopper until it was irrelevant. i saved it as it was instead of in photoshop, so i had to more or less start from scratch. it still makes me feel better that it isn’t just sitting around getting all cobwebby.

  3. Got a Grip

    nightowl, hold on to your very faint hope, but don’t be surprised if it gets dashed on the rocks of the tide of bullshit that is our judicial system. If they really want to make contempt work, Congress needs to use it powers of inherent contempt, which will bypass the courts that are filled with BushCo appointee and the ensuing clusterfuck. So I don’t have much hope for them making this work, especially since it looks like they’re about to cave on teleco immunity…..

  4. nightowl724

    Oh, gotta, you just hadda busta my infinitesimal bubble. Sigh…

  5. Got a Grip

    It’s a dirty job, nightowl, but somebody’s gotta do it….

  6. nightowl724

    Well, I suppose I should thank you for keeping me in touch with what passes for reality these days…

  7. TRM

    LOL,,, anyone wanna know what I think? 🙂

  8. Friend of the court

    Do tell, TRM. Where you been?

  9. Pingback: Alberto Gonzales: Not just unethical, but criminal? « Grievance Project