They should have used harsh interrogation tactics on them!

From The Washington Post:

Two key architects of the Bush administration’s controversial interrogation policies defended their legal positions today, sparring with House Democrats over whether discredited Justice Department opinions led to unlawful torture of military and CIA detainees.

The testimony from David S. Addington, chief of staff to Vice President Cheney, and John C. Yoo, a former senior Justice Department lawyer, was light on details but heavy on semantic disputes with lawmakers on a House Judiciary subcommittee.


Original DVD cover.

Both witnesses avoided answering a host of specific questions about their roles in establishing a regime of harsh interrogation tactics at the CIA and Defense Department, while arguing that such tactics had been crucial in preventing another terrorist attack on U.S. soil after Sept. 11, 2001.

Yoo was the main author of an August 2002 memo, later rescinded by the Justice Department, that narrowly defined torture as treatment that resulted in “death, organ failure or serious impairment of bodily functions.” In March 2003, Yoo wrote another memo arguing that federal laws that prohibit assault, maiming and other crimes did not apply to military interrogators who questioned al-Qaeda captives because the president’s ultimate authority as commander in chief overrode such statutes.

…snip…

In his testimony, Addington minimized his role in setting Bush administration interrogation policies and said he could not recall numerous details surrounding the internal debate. He said he was more deeply involved in the CIA’s interrogation program than the one used by the Pentagon at the military detention facility in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

…snip…

Much of the hearing was consumed by legalistic disputes over what answers Addington or Yoo could provide. Yoo frequently said he could not answer details about internal deliberations, citing instructions from the Justice Department.

Addington, who appeared at the hearing under subpoena, seemed visibly perturbed by many of the questions and engaged in a series of contentious and often hostile exchanges with subcommittee Democrats. He refused to answer some questions and criticized others.

During one tense exchange with Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.), Addington asked sharply: “Is there a question pending, ma’am?” He then began to suggest a different line of questioning, prompting Schultz to respond: “I’m pretty clear on why I’m asking you a question.”

Such tensions prompted Democrats to complain that they were being stonewalled. Rep. Mel Watt (D-N.C.) said he would be “banging my head against the wall and wasting my five minutes” of allotted time by questioning Addington and Yoo.

About these ads

9 Comments

Filed under 9/11, al-Qaeda, Chimpy, CIA, David Addington, Defense Department, Democrats, Dick Cheney, George W. Bush, Guantanamo, House Judiciary Committee, humor, John Yoo, Justice Department, movies, parody, Pentagon, politics, Republicans, September 11, snark, Torture, waterboarding, Wordpress Political Blogs

9 responses to “They should have used harsh interrogation tactics on them!

  1. nightowl724

    I love all the details you added, nonnie, like ballbuster and we’ve seen this sh*t before. I especially appreciate them because no details were forthcoming from Addington and Yoo. They were apparently well-schooled at The GAS (The Gonzo Academy of Stonewalling).

  2. thanks, nightlowl! :D
    i was proud of my rep, debbie w-s. i’ve been angry at her a lot lately, but she stepped up to the plate and voted against fisa and now this.

  3. jlms qkw - jenn

    exclusive bogus footage!

    gitmo detainees quoted.

    a total hit in every detail.

    imho

  4. jlms qkw - jenn

    new idea:
    apparently, vitter and craig are doing something with a federal marriage act. a hidden saint had a rec-listed diary today.

    can’t you use wedding planner or the wedding singer or something to nail those two clowns?

  5. jenn!
    you caught the bogus footage!!! yay!!! :D
    ooooh!! craig and vitter, 2 of my favorite subjects! i’ve already used the wedding planner for a poster. i have to see what the wedding singer cover looks like. i already have a poster almost done for tomorrow (and i think it’s very cute–she said immodestly), but i will look for the story and an appropriate movie. thanks for the tip!! mmmwwaahhh!!!

  6. jeb

    Congressional oversight in the 21st century. “We came up here, now don’t ask us about what we do or did because it’s none of your business. Just remind the country of what a wonderful job we’re doing protecting the country and move on. Otherwise, it’s none of your damn business!”

    I’m sure that is what the founding fathers intended all along, right?

  7. jeb,
    congressional oversight has become an oxymoron. they might as well just sit around and have tea for all the information they are able to accumulate.

    p.s. how was the vacation? have you moved yet?

  8. jeb

    I’m on vacation with the kids right now and it’s good. I won’t move until mid-July.

  9. cool! hope you are having a wonderful time!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s