More Tsuris From Burris

From The Washington Post:

CHICAGO — Sen. Roland W. Burris (D-Ill.), appointed late last year to replace President Obama in the U.S. Senate, has informed Illinois lawmakers that he did not tell them the complete story about his contacts with close associates of Gov. Rod Blagojevich (D) before he got the job.

werenoangels
Original DVD cover.

The admission came in a sworn affidavit filed quietly by Burris last week with the Illinois House, and it raises questions about the new senator’s credibility as he begins to finish the final two years of Obama’s term. “I’m disappointed and I do feel betrayed,” state Rep. Jack Franks (D-Ill.) said today as Illinois’s political leadership began to assess the implications of Burris’s admission. “He was sworn to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth, and it’s obvious that didn’t occur.”

Burris was appointed by Blagojevich in December, following the governor’s arrest on federal corruption charges in a case that included allegations of trying to profit from his authority to fill Obama’s seat.

…snip…

One condition of Burris’s seating was that he testify openly and truthfully to the state House committee that was considering the impeachment of Blagojevich. Burris acknowledged in the affidavit that he left out several key points in that testimony.

…snip…

In questioning by lawmakers, Burris said that after July, when he spoke with former Blagojevich deputy Lon Monk, he had no conversations with anyone close to the governor until one of the governor’s lawyers called him on Dec. 26. Blagojevich offered him the job on Dec. 28.

Rep. Jim Durkin (R) asked Burris if he had spoken to associates of Blagojevich, listing six of them by name. Burris conferred with his lawyer and then answered that he had spoken with Monk.

Burris stated in the new affidavit that he actually had spoken with three or four people on the list, including Blagojevich’s brother Rob and top fundraiser John Wyma. He said he made clear to them that he was interested in the Obama seat.

Rob Blagojevich called him three times — once in October and twice in November — to ask Burris to raise money for the governor, according to the affidavit, news of which was first published today by the Chicago Sun-Times.

Burris said he asked the governor’s brother about the Senate appointment but did not offer to raise money.

…snip…

In the affidavit, Burris also said he neglected to mention that he asked John Harris, the governor’s chief of staff, about the Senate seat in an October conversation. He said he called Harris to recommend his nephew for a state job and mentioned the Senate seat at the end.

Harris was arrested and charged with Blagojevich on Dec. 9 in a bribery conspiracy case.

From the Chicago Sun-Times:

State lawmakers are calling for a criminal investigation into whether U.S. Sen. Roland Burris committed perjury before a state impeachment panel, in the wake of a Sun-Times exclusive story published online today.

…snip…

State Rep. James Durkin (R-Western Springs) said Saturday that the Sangamon County state prosecutor‚s office will be asked to review Burris‚ Jan. 8 sworn testimony before the House panel to determine whether Burris (D-Ill.) perjured himself.

…snip…

An aide to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), who initially sought to block Burris from being seated, said the Senate leader intended to take a closer look at Burris’ new affidavit. But Reid’s office declined to say whether the new revelations would reopen the question of whether Burris should be Illinois’ junior senator.

“Senator Reid is reviewing the affidavit,” Reid spokesman Jim Manley told the Sun-Times Saturday.

After Reid’s hand was essentially forced by Burris and African-American supporters in Congress, Burris was formally seated in mid-January, leaving the Senate few options in responding to the matter. If criminal charges were ever to surface against Burris, the Senate Ethics Committee could probe his conduct and recommend censure, but outright removal from the Senate would require a two-thirds vote.

Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), who also had reservations about Burris’ appointment, intends to more closely examine Burris’ evolving storyline before determining a response, a spokesman said.

…snip…

The Sun-Times investigation found that former Gov. Rod Blagojevich’s brother solicited Burris for up to $10,000 in campaign cash before Blagojevich named Burris to the coveted post — something Burris initially failed to disclose under oath before an Illinois House impeachment panel.

The affidavit is dated Feb. 5 — three weeks after Burris was sworn in to replace President Obama in the Senate.

Burris — who did not give money to the Blagojevich campaign fund in response to the previously undisclosed solicitation — provided a copy of the sworn statement to the Chicago Sun-Times Friday in response to questions about his contacts with the Blagojevich camp about fund-raising.

Burris acknowledged having three conversations with Robert Blagojevich, who headed the Friends of Blagojevich campaign fund. At least one of those took place at a campaign office where phones were being recorded by the FBI, according to sources.

Burris‚ statement offers the third version of events he has given about his discussions concerning the Senate seat, to which Blagojevich appointed him in late December, after Blagojevich was hit with federal corruption charges that included an allegation he tried to sell the Senate appointment.

Burris said he sent the new statement to House Majority Leader Barbara Flynn Currie (D-Chicago) after he read the transcript of his testimony before the impeachment committee she headed and realized it was incomplete. “There were several facts that I was not given the opportunity to make during my testimony,” Burris said. “I voluntarily submitted an affidavit so everything was transparent.”

…snip…

In October and again in November, Burris spoke with Robert Blagojevich, who initially asked him to host a fund-raiser. Burris said he’d get back to him after the election, sources with knowledge of the conversations said. The two later talked again, and Burris again was asked for campaign cash.

Burris said he refused to contribute and “made it unequivocally clear … that it would be inappropriate and pose a major conflict because I was interested in the Senate vacancy.”

A source with knowledge of the exchange said there was some discussion about Burris possibly getting others to give or raise money on his behalf. Not so, according to Burris: “I did not donate or help raise a single dollar for the governor from those conversations and would never consider making a donation through a third party.”

In all, Burris expressed interest in the Senate seat to five people in Blagojevich’s camp, documents obtained by the Sun-Times show. He disclosed just one of those contacts when asked Jan. 8 by state Rep. James Durkin (R-Western Springs) during the impeachment hearings to name any contact he had with Blagojevich’s people about the seat.

…snip…

In a sworn statement filed with the House panel Jan. 5, before he testified, Burris said he had no contact with Blagojevich’s camp about the Senate seat aside from his appointment in late December. In testimony before the committee, he added that he spoke with Lon Monk, Blagojevich’s former chief of staff. In his new affidavit, Burris confirms he also spoke of his interest in the Senate appointment with Blagojevich insiders John Harris, Doug Scofield and John Wyma.

14 Comments

Filed under Barack Obama, Corruption, Dick Durbin, FBI, Harry Reid, humor, Impeachment, movies, parody, politics, Scandals, Senate, Senate Ethics Committee, snark, Wiretaps, Wordpress Political Blogs

14 responses to “More Tsuris From Burris

  1. jeb

    I knew the Dem leadership was making a mistake by seating him but that’s Reid, all bark and no bite.

    Blago will has left a trail of slime across the political landscape that is truly breath taking in it’s permanence.

  2. i don’t blame reid for this, jeb. he was under pressure from just about everyone, and he had no choice. maybe it’s the fault of the illinois reps. if the sun-times could find out the info, why couldn’t they? and what about fitzgerald? he had burris on tape! if he was so concerned about corruption in government, why the hell didn’t he tell reid that burris didn’t tell the whole truth at the impeachment hearing?

  3. Blago, the comedy gift that keeps on giving.

  4. yes, but he couldn’t have done it alone, neon vincent. burris gets the best supporting actor nomination.

  5. jeb

    There’s lots of blame to go around Nonnie and I agree that Fitz should have sat some people down and said “This is what we have.”

    I may be quick to blame Reid but I’m not very impressed with him on most things. I just couldn’t understand why they would seat anyone appointed by someone so overtly crooked.

    As I’ve said here before, I agree with Feingold, they need to take away the power to appoint Senators from Governors and turn it back over to the democratic process.

  6. nightowl724

    Tsk, tsk, tsk. Burris + Blago = not funny

    Bwa, ha, ha! nonnie + funny = nunnie

    Score: 3 out of 3 possible hats

    Odd, but Burris doesn’t look Jewish… 😉

  7. jeb,
    i agree that the selection of a senator should be taken out of the hands of the governor. i think that each state should decide on an order of succession should a senator not complete a term. special elections are very expensive, and they are not worth it when there is only a short period of time left. maybe it could be the lieutenant governor or the speaker of the state house or the longest-serving state senator. that’s up to the states to decide. it sure beats the hell out of the governor being the deciderer.

    as for harry reid, he pisses me off a lot, but i think he gets too much blame. he doesn’t act in a vacuum. there are a lot of very loud voices in the senate, and if they don’t like what he does, they can choose someone else. i think the problem is that it’s a really crappy job, and nobody else wants it. in this case, he was under pressure from the black congressional caucus and a lot of other groups. fitz didn’t pipe up with what he had, and blago was not convicted or impeached at that point, so what else could reid do? according to the laws in illinois, burris was a legitimate pick. no matter what reid did, he was going to piss off someone. i just hope that the illinois dems are working hard now to find someone to run against burris in 2010. we know he won’t have enough class to step down.

  8. nightowl! 😀
    where have you been? i’ve missed you. every time i sneak a little something into a poster, i always hope you’ll be here to find it. jenn has been doing a very good job of finding the little things, but she’s on vacation. good thing you came back when you did! 😉

  9. nightowl724

    I was off on a Valentine’s Day binge, practicing for Mardi Gras next week! I’m glad you don’t require a doctor’s excuse to re-enter your sanctum. ‘Cuz my doc was partying right along with me and she’ll be “out of the office” a lot longer than I was!

  10. nightowl724

    VD card? Funny? I sent that to like 10 people! Oops! What I meant was, I picked that card specially for you, nonnie.

  11. we just like when you check in, so we know that you’re okay. you know how we worry. buffy (that’s trm’s new name given to him by fotc) comes around looking for hugs, and you aren’t here.

    by the way, thank you for the valentine’s card. very funny! 😆

  12. nightowl,
    i was typing while you were hitting ‘submit comment’! 😆

  13. dusty

    Sweet-friggin-jesus-in-a-speedo.

    Burris is a real tool isn’t he? Lying sack of sheep $hit. He seemed so desperate and that bugged the crap out of me.

    Now, he not only bugs me, I want to see him tarred and feathered and run out of DC on a rail. Jerkwad.

  14. dusty,
    he was an embarrassment to the dem party the moment he accepted the seat from b-rod. other dems had enough class and conscience to say thanks, but no thanks. burris had that space that he had to fill on his personal taj mahal that he built for himself, so he sought the seat and accepted. not sure what the right solution is. i don’t think he deserves to be where he is, but i don’t know if it is worth the time and trouble to try to get rid of him. by the time all the hoops are jumped through, his term will already be up. instead, i hope the illinois dems are looking for and promoting better people to run for the seat in 2010.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s