Don’t know if he’s a prince, but I hope someone crowns him!

From The Los Angeles Times:

Former Vice President Dick Cheney personally oversaw at least four briefings with senior members of Congress about controversial interrogation programs, part of a secretive and forceful defense he mounted throughout 2005 in an effort to maintain support for the harsh techniques used against detainees.

The Cheney-led briefings came at some of the most crucial moments for the program, as congressional oversight committees were threatening to investigate or even terminate the techniques used in interrogations, according to lawmakers, congressional officials and current and former intelligence officials.

Original DVD cover.

Cheney’s role in helping handle intelligence issues in the Bush administration has been well documented, particularly his advocacy for the use of aggressive methods and warrantless wiretapping against suspected terrorists. But his hands-on role in defending the interrogation program to lawmakers has not been previously publicized.

The CIA made no mention of the former vice president’s role in documents delivered to Capitol Hill last month which listed every lawmaker who had been briefed on “enhanced interrogation techniques” since 2002.


The revelations do not shed light on whether top Democrats, as Republicans contend, were aware that waterboarding, a harsh technique that simulates drowning, was being employed on suspected terrorists as early as the fall of 2002. That discussion has dominated Capitol Hill since last month, when House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who was not present at any of the briefings that included Cheney, accused the agency of misleading her in a 2002 briefing about the use of waterboarding.


The CIA declined to comment on why Cheney’s presence in meetings was left out of the records. One senior intelligence official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said identities of individual briefers are intentionally concealed in all cases — names do not appear in any of the CIA documents that describe congressional briefings.


One of the most critical Cheney-led briefings came in late October 2005 when the vice president and Porter Goss, then director of the CIA, described the interrogation methods to Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), according to congressional and intelligence sources.

One knowledgeable official described the meeting as contentious. Cheney and Goss, with other CIA officials present, tried to persuade the former Vietnam POW to back off an anti-torture amendment that had already won the backing of 90 senators as part of the annual spending bill for the Defense Department.

The McCain amendment would have ended practices such as waterboarding by forbidding “cruel, degrading and inhumane” treatment of detainees.


Earlier, Cheney met with a friendlier audience, Sens. Thad Cochran (R-Miss.) and Ted Stevens (R-Alaska), who oversaw the Pentagon’s appropriation measure and were longtime Cheney friends. Cochran said Tuesday that it was the first time he had been given a full description of what waterboarding entailed.


Cheney’s briefing on interrogations began in the winter of 2005 as the top Democrats on the Senate and House intelligence committees, Sen. John D. Rockefeller IV (D-W.Va.) and Rep. Jane Harman (D-Venice) publicly advocated a full investigation of the tactics used against top Al Qaeda terrorism suspects.

On March 8, 2005 — two days after a detailed report in the New York Times about interrogations — Cheney gathered Rockefeller, Harman and the chairmen of the intelligence panels, Sen. Pat Roberts (R-Kan.), and Rep. Peter Hoekstra (R-Mich.), according to current and former intelligence officials.

Weeks earlier, Roberts had publicly suggested possible support for the interrogation investigation sought by Rockefeller.

But by early March 2005, Roberts announced that he opposed a separate investigation, and the matter soon died.


Filed under Abu Ghraib, al-Qaeda, Chimpy, CIA, Democrats, Dick Cheney, George W. Bush, House Intelligence Committee, humor, Jane Harman, Jay Rockefeller, John McCain, movies, Nancy Pelosi, parody, Pat Roberts, politics, Porter Goss, Republicans, Senate Intelligence Committee, snark, Ted Stevens, Thad Cochran, Torture, waterboarding, Wiretaps, Wordpress Political Blogs

19 responses to “Don’t know if he’s a prince, but I hope someone crowns him!

  1. the entire MSM should be screaming about all the lies and misstatements and revisionism this complete piece of human shit with 5 deferments keeps spewing.

    but they dont – they respect his office and the man

    there is no torture good enough or strong enough for him — i am so against torture – EXCEPT for him…. bamboo shoots up his nails and his Dick

    • i don’t think they respect him at all, dcAp. i’ll bet he’s just as nasty to most of the media as he appears to be toward his opponents. they keep playing parts of his speeches, because they love conflict. they think it makes good tv, so they look for it in everything. deadeye dick knows that, so he continues to spread his bullshit all over the tube. when he’s too busy, he sends his nasty daughter.

  2. There can only be one Prince of Darkness!

  3. Pingback: 6/3-Political Championship Wrestling: PCW Extreme Political TV « Political Championship Wrestling

  4. He’s one scary man. I bet he even was a scary dad.

    • he is a scary man, but i don’t know if he was a scary dad. he’s the type who thinks that he and his progeny are above the rest of us. they don’t have to answer to the rest of society. that’s why the only gay person he gives a damn about is his daughter. the rest can go to hell.

  5. jeb

    You’re wonderful cover blurb says it all Nonnie. However, I know how to shut him up. Put him under oath. I’ll bet he wouldn’t say a word then.

  6. Friend of the court

    “widescreed”, ๐Ÿ˜‰
    coast to coast , 24/7

  7. He’s got two items on his agenda with all this public blathering.
    1. He’s trying to make a case for himself before he’s indicted and tried for a variety of high crimes.
    2. He’s trying to help his evil spawn Liz get into politics by exposing her to the media as his hapless sidekick. She’s a younger version of him with tits.

    • karen,
      i think you’re correct. the first is obvious. the second motive wasn’t apparent until the buzz started about snarly, jr. running for office. i’m 100% positive that wasn’t spontaneous. that was the plan from the beginning. what other reason would there be for her being the point person when she had no knowledge of top secret material? if she did have knowledge, then cheney had to have broken a lot of laws in telling her.

    • I think Dick’s tits are just as formidable as Lizzy’s; but just the thought of either one of them having tits the way the rest of humanity does makes me hurl.

  8. I can’t stand to listen to him, but the internets seem to indicate his lips are moving a lot these days.
    I liked him better sequestered in an undisclosed location.