Judicial Restraint? Next Time, Put Him in Restraints!

From Glenn Greenwald at Salon:

As I wrote at the time, I thought the condemnations of Rep. Joe Wilson’s heckling of Barack Obama during his September health care speech were histrionic and excessive.  Wilson and Obama are both political actors, it occurred in the middle of a political speech about a highly political dispute, and while the outburst was indecorous and impolite, Obama is not entitled to be treated as royalty.  That was all much ado about nothing.  By contrast, the behavior of Justice Alito at last night’s State of the Union addressvisibly shaking his head and mouthing the words “not true” when Obama warned of the dangers of the Court’s Citizens United ruling — was a serious and substantive breach of protocol that reflects very poorly on Alito and only further undermines the credibility of the Court.  It has nothing to do with etiquette and everything to do with the Court’s ability to adhere to its intended function.

Original DVD cover

There’s a reason that Supreme Court Justices — along with the Joint Chiefs of Staff — never applaud or otherwise express any reaction at a State of the Union address.  It’s vital — both as a matter of perception and reality — that those institutions remain apolitical, separate and detached from partisan wars.  The Court’s pronouncements on (and resolutions of) the most inflammatory and passionate political disputes retain legitimacy only if they possess a credible claim to being objectively grounded in law and the Constitution, not political considerations.


[…] the endless, deceitful sloganeering by right-wing lawyers about “judicial restraint” and “activism” — all while the judges they most revere cavalierly violate those “principles” over and over — exacerbates that problem further (the unnecessarily broad scope of Citizens United is the latest example of that, too, and John “balls and strikes” Roberts may be the greatest hypocrite ever to sit on the Supreme Court).  All of that is destroying the ability of the judicial branch to be perceived — and to act — as one of the few truly apolitical and objective institutions.

Justice Alito’s flamboyantly insinuating himself into a pure political event, in a highly politicized manner, will only hasten that decline. […] Alito is now a political (rather than judicial) hero to Republicans and a political enemy of Democrats, which is exactly the role a Supreme Court Justice should not occupy.

The Justices are seated at the very front of the chamber, and it was predictable in the extreme that the cameras would focus on them as Obama condemned their ruling. […] Recall all of the lip-pursed worrying from The New Republic‘s Jeffrey Rosen and his secret, nameless friends over the so-called “judicial temperament” of Sonia Sotomayor.  Alito’s conduct is the precise antithesis of what “judicial temperament” is supposed to produce.

Right-wing criticisms — that it was Obama who acted inappropriately by using his  SOTU address to condemn the Court’s decision — are just inane.  Many of the Court’s rulings engender political passions and have substantial political consequences — few more so than a ruling that invalidated long-standing campaign finance laws.  Obama is an elected politician in a political branch and has every right to express his views on such a significant court ruling.  While the factual claims Obama made about the ruling are subject to reasonable dispute, they’re well within the realm of acceptable political rhetoric and are far from being “false” […] Presidents have a long history of condemning Court rulings with which they disagree — Republican politicians, including Presidents, have certainly never shied away from condemning Roe v. Wade in the harshest of terms — and Obama’s comments last night were entirely consistent with that practice.  While Presidents do not commonly criticize the Court in the SOTU address, it is far from unprecedented either.


What’s most disturbing here is the increasing trend of right-wing Justices inserting themselves ever more aggressively into overtly political disputes in a way that seriously undermines their claims of apolitical objectivity.  Antonin Scalia goes hunting with Dick Cheney, dubiously refuses to recuse himself from a lawsuit challenging the legality of Cheney’s actions, and then rules in Cheney’s favor.  Scalia has an increasing tendency to make highly politicized comments about purely political conflicts, most recently defending torture in an interview with 60 Minutes.  As part of Clarence Thomas’ promotional efforts to sell his book, he spent substantial time building his conservative icon status with the furthest right-wing media elements — even parading himself around on Rush Limbaugh’s radio program — and turned himself into the food fight of the week between Democrats and Republicans.

It was clear from Sam Alito’s confirmation hearing and his record of appellate opinions that he is a dogmatic, state-revering, right-wing judge.  But last night, he unmasked himself as a politicized and intemperate Republican as well.


Filed under Antonin Scalia, Barack Obama, Clarence Thomas, Constitution, Democrats, Dick Cheney, humor, Joe Wilson, John Roberts, movies, parody, politics, Republicans, Rush Limbaugh, Samuel Alito, snark, Supreme Court, Wordpress Political Blogs

19 responses to “Judicial Restraint? Next Time, Put Him in Restraints!

  1. Something about a dickwad wearing duct tape makes me smile.

  2. Friend of the court

    I must change my user name. Any sugestions?

  3. I ran into someone online whose response to insults was “I’ve been called an asshole by better people than the likes of you.” The only example I could find was Justice Alito, back when he was on the Federal Court of Appeals. Now, I’m not so sure of Alito being ‘a better person’ than I am.

  4. I was saddened that Justice “double stuff” Thomas couldn’t be bothered by making an appearance last night. Must have been busy with some strict constructionism somewhere. Couldn’t help but notice my beloved Senator Cornyn smirking like a kid who hid a stink bomb and was waiting for it to go off. The rest of his bunch looked like they were brought in from an alternative school and forced to attend assembly. All that was missing was Coach Hines.

    • i thought the rethugs looked like the boys from the audio-visual club. little giggles and whispering to each other like they were in junior high, because nobody else wants to hang out with them.

      i wasn’t surprised that clarence wasn’t there as soon as i realized that scalia was absent. clarence is firmly ensconced in tony’s rectum, so if tony doesn’t show, then clarence doesn’t show. they should have kept sammy with them. he’s definitely not ready for primetime.

  5. The Beatles said it best– “It’s all too much”

  6. Actually, when it comes to Alito- Nowhere man

    What was with the applause @ the juncture?

    Even Pelosi jumped to her feet to applaud?
    Then she was handed a note.
    Dammit Nancy, you were supposed to scowl, not applaud.

    • which juncture do you mean? i don’t remember nancy getting a note. i was on the computer while the speech was on, so i didn’t see all the action.

      • After Obama said the supreme court has opened the floodgates for corporations, special interests, including foreign interests to influence voting– (fter Alito did his mime mouthing off bit) a whole slew of people did the standing ovation/applause thing– including Geithner, Biden, Pelosi, & Eric Holder (Attny Gen?)

        • watch schumer right behind sammy. he was staring right at him when he was shaking his head. i had heard on tv that schumer leaned in towards sammy when he stood up and clapped.

          • Why the clapping? Shouldn’t there have been either “boos” or a low grumble???

            Ruth Bader Ginsberg is not looking good.

            • they were clapping for what obama said, they weren’t clapping for sammy.

              ruth bader-ginsberg has always looked frail. i hope she’s well. she’s a tough old bird.

  7. KarenZipdrive

    I would have given my left earlobe to see Sonia Sotomayor elbow him in the head and shush his stupid ass.

  8. roberts, alito, thomas – the gifts of the bush family that keep on giving

    those three (and scalia) are gonorrhea on the world of justice