The Big Queasy

James Comey testifying to the Senate Judiciary Committee:

It makes me mildly nauseous to think we might have had an impact on the election. But, honestly, it wouldn’t change the decision.

pepto-bismol3

Original advertisement

From FiveThirtyEight:

Hillary Clinton would probably be president if FBI Director James Comey had not sent a letter to Congress on Oct. 28. The letter, which said the FBI had “learned of the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to the investigation” into the private email server that Clinton used as secretary of state, upended the news cycle and soon halved Clinton’s lead in the polls, imperiling her position in the Electoral College.

The letter isn’t the only reason that Clinton lost. It does not excuse every decision the Clinton campaign made. Other factors may have played a larger role in her defeat, and it’s up to Democrats to examine those as they choose their strategy for 2018 and 2020.

But the effect of those factors — say, Clinton’s decision to give paid speeches to investment banks, or her messaging on pocket-book issues, or the role that her gender played in the campaign — is hard to measure. The impact of Comey’s letter is comparatively easy to quantify, by contrast. At a maximum, it might have shifted the race by 3 or 4 percentage points toward Donald Trump, swinging Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Florida to him, perhaps along with North Carolina and Arizona. At a minimum, its impact might have been only a percentage point or so. Still, because Clinton lost Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin by less than 1 point, the letter was probably enough to change the outcome of the Electoral College.

And yet, from almost the moment that Trump won the White House, many mainstream journalists have been in denial about the impact of Comey’s letter.

…snip…

The motivation for this seems fairly clear: If Comey’s letter altered the outcome of the election, the media may have some responsibility for the result. The story dominated news coverage for the better part of a week, drowning out other headlines, whether they were negative for Clinton (such as the news about impending Obamacare premium hikes) or problematic for Trump (such as his alleged ties to Russia). And yet, the story didn’t have a punchline: Two days before the election, Comey disclosed that the emails hadn’t turned up anything new.

…snip…

News of the Comey letter broke just before 1 p.m. Eastern time on Oct. 28, when Utah. Rep Jason Chaffetz tweeted about it, noting the existence of the letter and stating (incorrectly, it turned out2) that the case into Clinton’s private email server had been “reopened.”

…snip…

Clinton’s standing in the polls fell sharply. She’d led Trump by 5.9 percentage points in FiveThirtyEight’s popular vote projection at 12:01 a.m. on Oct. 28. A week later — after polls had time to fully reflect the letter — her lead had declined to 2.9 percentage points. That is to say, there was a shift of about 3 percentage points against Clinton. And it was an especially pernicious shift for Clinton because (at least according to the FiveThirtyEight model) Clinton was underperforming in swing states as compared to the country overall. In the average swing state,3 Clinton’s lead declined from 4.5 percentage points at the start of Oct. 28 to just 1.7 percentage points on Nov. 4.

…snip…

The real story is that the Comey letter had a fairly large and measurable impact, probably enough to cost Clinton the election. It wasn’t the only thing that mattered, and it might not have been the most important. But the media is still largely in denial about how much of an effect it had.

There’s a lot more at FiveThirtyEight. Interesting read, and I urge you to read the entire thing. One warning, though. It might make you mildly nauseous.

Advertisements

2 Comments

Filed under Advertising, Congress, Democrats, FBI, Hillary Clinton, humor, James Comey, Media, parody, politics, Republicans, Russia, satire, Senate Judiciary Committee, snark, Wordpress Political Blogs

2 responses to “The Big Queasy

  1. I have believed that Comey’s announcement of examining email on the skinny’s scum bag’s computer had a sizable impact. That was one factor plus maybe others caused her to lose the election. But it all is so suspicious.

    What is with the mildly nauseous thing with Comey? I’ve never heard of such a ridiculous statement. I think he is possibly an underhanded dealer and I still think it is bull crap that looking at Clinton’s email again was concocted.Why did it get leaked? That will never be answered.

    Yet another thing to consider is why did Model T leave Comey in his position when he was removing all the other folks that worked under Obama?

    • Comey thinks of himself as some great arbiter of what is right and what is wrong and the most righteous man on the planet. What really pisses me off is that the media is constantly harping on Hillary for not taking personal responsibility (after she said she takes personal responsibility), but they don’t seem to focus on Comey taking personal responsibility (they just thinks it adorable that he had a mild bout of nausea while the rest of us have been projectile vomiting since November), and the vast majority have never claimed any personal responsibility for all the free publicity they gave to Twitler and how they did nothing but bash Hillary throughout the campaign as they nitpicked her every sentence.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s